Navigazione – Piano del sito

Nine Questions for James S. Amelang

James Amelang e Danièle Tosato-Rigo

Riassunto

Interview of James S. Amelang by Danièle Tosato-Rigo

Inizio pagina

Estratto del testo

Questo documento sarà pubblicato online con testo integrale in maggio 2019.

Anteprima del testo

1. Both microhistory and egodocuments have received much attention recently. However, the same cannot be said regarding the question of the relations between them, which strike many observers as promising yet uncertain. Would you agree ?

There are many reasons to think of egodocuments – a particular type of historical source – and microhistory – a particular approach to or technique for framing historical research and writing – as fitting together closely. That said, if one surveys the major microhistories written to date, it is easy to get the impression that relatively few of them resort to egodocuments as their principal source. In other words, the fit between the two may be « natural », but it is hardly a given. And in any event, the question is not so much the snugness of their fit, but the ease with which historians can promote a synergy between them. When brought together by a talented and imaginative historian, they can promote forward movement, which is what we all should be...

Inizio pagina

Per citare questo articolo

Riferimento elettronico

James Amelang e Danièle Tosato-Rigo, « Nine Questions for James S. Amelang », Études de lettres [Online], 1-2 | 2016, Messo online il 01 maggio 2019, consultato il 17 ottobre 2017. URL : http://edl.revues.org/888 ; DOI : 10.4000/edl.888

Inizio pagina

Autori

James Amelang

Universidad autónoma de Madrid

Danièle Tosato-Rigo

Université de Lausanne

Articoli dello stesso autore

Inizio pagina

Diritti d'autore

© Études de lettres

Inizio pagina
  • Logo Université de Lausanne
  • Revues.org